>> (a) the kernel config files move to a more functional basis:
>> NOTEBOOK, DESKTOP, WEBSERVER, FILESERVER, RAIDSERVER etc, and/or
>This one is a good idea I think.
>We should also provide more than GENERIC, at last for i386 (too much bloat).

	I think these names are easier to understand, and agree that it is a
	good thing, but...

	NOTEBOOK is too tricky to support.  There are too many speical
	cases and it will be almost impossible to make a "for every notebook
	possible" configuration file.

itojun