Subject: Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock()
To: None <>
From: Justin T. Gibbs <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/25/1999 11:31:20
[ I've dropped based on a request from Theo since
  he cannot post back to some of these lists. ]

>Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current
>priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it.

This is what I meant to suggest, but if this is not doable, create a new