Subject: re: Tux and Beastie!
To: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 06/18/1999 16:18:53
Perry Metzger writes:
>"Jordan K. Hubbard" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> As all of you no-doubt know by now, Kirk *does* have certain
>> standards on how the image is used and blowtorching solaris logos or
>> sodomizing buoyant waterfowl falls well outside those standards.
>And what's wrong with a little consentual sex? I thought that
>cross-fertilization was what our community was all about! BTW, just to
>be clear: Penguins have a cloaca, and as such it isn't technically
>sodomy (ignoring the inter-species aspects).
Havent seen the shirt, but as described, it sounded distinctly
And even if it was -- does it really need to be spelled out why the
shirt, as a public, visible gesture was offensive and thoroughly inappropriate?