Subject: Re: signal(SIGSEGV, SIG_IGN) -> 100% CPU
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
Date: 06/14/1999 11:49:38
[ On Monday, June 14, 1999 at 18:29:05 (+1000), Darren Reed wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: signal(SIGSEGV, SIG_IGN) -> 100% CPU
> If you had of tested, you would have found the behaviour consistant
> with that on NetBSD. The only difference between Solaris, SunOS4 and
> NetBSD is that the Solaris man page is more correct than either of
> the other two.
Ah ha! I thought so -- this is an example of a tech writer assuming the
implementation of all the syscalls is uniform across the board! ;-)
Perhaps that's what actually happened to 4BSD too!
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <firstname.lastname@example.org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com>; Secrets of the Weird <firstname.lastname@example.org>