Subject: Re: nfsd and process load sharing
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Frank van der Linden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/04/1999 13:33:32
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 09:28:04PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> actually, this would mean that on a lightly loaded system, every
> nfsd would be kept in memory as they would round robin, rather
> than just having the few necessary in core, and the others possible
> paged out...
> i think i prefer the current behaviour..
Well, I wasn't serious about it to begin with. Though it would not
have mattered much, nfsds spend their lives almost entirely in the
kernel, in memory that will always be paged in.