Subject: Re: vnode locking procedure change to suport stacked fs's.
To: Phil Nelson <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/01/1999 13:16:46
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Phil Nelson wrote:
> >...along these lines... is it possible for vnodes which are still
> >referenced to actually be on the free list? If not, then I'd like
> >to nuke the free list completely, and pool_put() vnodes when they're
> >no longer used (so that free vnode pool pages can be reclaimed if
> Could this possibly be related to the "free vnode isn't" panic we're
> seeing on the pc532?
Which panic is this? What fs?