Subject: Re: vnode locking procedure change to suport stacked fs's.
To: Phil Nelson <>
From: Bill Studenmund <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/01/1999 13:16:46
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Phil Nelson wrote:

> >...along these lines... is it possible for vnodes which are still
> >referenced to actually be on the free list?  If not, then I'd like
> >to nuke the free list completely, and pool_put() vnodes when they're
> >no longer used (so that free vnode pool pages can be reclaimed if
> >necessary).
> Could this possibly be related to the "free vnode isn't" panic we're
> seeing on the pc532?  

Which panic is this? What fs?

Take care,