Subject: Re: Test and set (was Re: postgreSQL)
To: Bill Sommerfeld <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
Date: 05/28/1999 17:36:43
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> There are a variety of different atomic instructions out there.
Yeah, as I found out. A bit of time on AltaVista didn't show many
people doing the same thing :-)
> To throw out one of the outliers in this space, PA has "compare and
> clear" as its atomic memory access instruction. This is sort of like
> "test and set", except that the "set" state is zero, and the "unset"
> state is non-zero.
> To make life even more interesting, semaphores have to be 16-byte
> aligned, though they're only 4 bytes wide.
> I suspect a "sufficiently MI" interface to an "atomic_op()"-like thing
> would have to abstract what the "set" and "reset" values and type look
> atomic_value_t v1 = ATOMIC_INIT_RESET;
> atomic_value_t v2 = ATOMIC_INIT_SET;
> int atomic_set(atomic_value_t *v);
> set *v; return 1 if it wasn't already set.
> void atomic_reset(atomic_value_t *v);
> reset *v.
> int atomic_isset(atomic_value_t *v);
> return 1 if *v is set, otherwise 0.
And this interface would live in <atomic.h> or <sys/atomic.h>? If
we need a kernel implementation (as for older MIPS chips), then
<sys/atomic.h> would be the way to go...
I'll put together a full proposal.