Subject: Re: vague proposal for new scheduler primitive: asynchronous "sleep"
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/09/1999 19:21:20
On Sun, 9 May 1999 18:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
"Eduardo E. Horvath" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > if some process calls wakeup(ident) before the timeout expires. as
> > with tsleep, timo==0 -> doesn't time out.
> How is this different from callint timeout() and then untimeout()?
timeout() and untimeout() don't allow for the wakeup() method of calling
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>