Subject: Re: __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG: dead or alive?
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/20/1999 16:54:51
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> writes:
> I thought __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG was dead. Am I misreemembering? If
> it is dead, why're we getting new drivers in the tree with ifdefs for
If you mean the lmc driver, this was an oversight on my part, since
it came from 1.3 based sources.