Subject: Re: __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG: dead or alive?
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/20/1999 16:54:51 
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> writes:

> I thought __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG was dead. Am I misreemembering?  If
> it is dead, why're we getting new drivers in the tree with ifdefs for
> __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG?

If you mean the lmc driver, this was an oversight on my part, since
it came from 1.3 based sources.

--Michael