Subject: Re: __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG: dead or alive?
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/20/1999 16:49:50 
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:39:45 -0700 
 Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:

 > I thought __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG was dead. Am I misreemembering?  If
 > it is dead, why're we getting new drivers in the tree with ifdefs for
 > __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG?

It's completely dead, and nothing in the tree should have that.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>