Subject: Re: __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG: dead or alive?
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 04/20/1999 16:49:50
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:39:45 -0700
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> I thought __BROKEN_INDIRECT_CONFIG was dead. Am I misreemembering? If
> it is dead, why're we getting new drivers in the tree with ifdefs for
It's completely dead, and nothing in the tree should have that.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>