Subject: Re: stand/.../
To: Simon Burge <>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/05/1999 09:20:41
Simon Burge <> writes:
> The Alpha doesn't use the bootprog_name[] variable, but at first glance
> looks like to could be changed to do so.  However, the Alpha does add
> the building OS revision to what it uses for bootprog_name[], which I
> don't think is a bad thing either.

The alpha used to use bootprog_name[].  I changed it last night to not
do so, because it's _unnecessary_ to do so.

There's no point in putting more in than has to be
dynamically generated...

Chris Demetriou - -
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.