Subject: Re: mmap'ing framebuffer memory in MI drivers...
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/21/1999 19:16:46
> >On Sat, 06 Mar 1999 09:34:28 -0800
> > Jason Thorpe <email@example.com> wrote:
> >I blame this on the fact that I haven't finished my first cup of coffee.
> >The Mach VM code definitely called d_mmap at mmap time, to check every
> >possibly page in the mapping, to ensure that the fault handler would never
> >UVM apparently doesn't do this. I personally would prefer that UVM did
> >the check at mmap time.
> >Chuck, is there a reason you didn't implement that?
> yes, clearly i forgot to put the code in. :) whoops!
> the thing to do is add enough args to udv_attach() so that it can do the
i just coded up a quick change to do this, and will send it to you
(and jason and a couple of others) for review as soon as i'm convinced
it does the right thing. (laptop won't boot new kernel for
seemingly-unrelated reasons... 8-)
Chris Demetriou - firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.