Subject: Re: newfs/newlfs/newfs_msdos (was Re: Some LFS troubles)
To: Michael K. Sanders <email@example.com>
From: Konrad Schroder <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/11/1999 11:44:43
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Michael K. Sanders wrote:
> To prevent the proliferation of inconsistently named commands to
> create filesystems, does anyone think making newfs(8) a wrapper (like
> mount(8)) that calls newfs_ffs/newfs_msdos/newfs_lfs/etc. would be a
> good idea?
It counds good to me; my only concern would be that the fact that
newfs_ffs is currently called `newfs' didn't cause any problems; since
there are a lot more of them than options to mount(8). Does the new
newfs just pass on all its options besides fs-type to newfs_xxx, or do the
options to newfs_ffs no longer directly work with newfs?