On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:06:24 -0500 
 Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com> wrote:

 > Mar 11 10:51:55 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment: lfs_segmapv failed for segment 933
 > Mar 11 10:51:55 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment failed segment 933: No message of desired type
 > Mar 11 10:51:55 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment: lfs_segmapv failed for segment 928
 > Mar 11 10:51:55 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment failed segment 928: No message of desired type
 > Mar 11 10:51:56 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment: lfs_segmapv failed for segment 932
 > Mar 11 10:51:56 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment failed segment 932: No message of desired type
 > Mar 11 10:51:57 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment: lfs_segmapv failed for segment 924
 > Mar 11 10:51:57 rekusant lfs_cleanerd[133]: clean_segment failed segment 924: No message of desired type

On that note...

lfs_cleanerd REALLY should be a kthread now... created dynamically when an
instance of the file system is mounted... one for each instance...

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>