Subject: Re: RFC: /kern/summary
To: None <email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Noriyuki Soda <email@example.com>
Date: 03/11/1999 17:16:20
> > The problem with binary format is, if the kernel changes, bang!
> > ps/top/systat/xosview are useless until you can upgrade userland.
> That's not true. While this is a problem, it is not a problem with
> binary format itself.
I think so, too.
> The real problem is, whether you have a 1:1 kernel->userspace data
> structure mapping without some extra version/tag/whatever information.
This is also true.
But in the ps/top/systat/xosview case, is this really needed ?
If there is a interface which provides the exact information needed
by ps/top/systat/xosview, the problem will disappear.
The real problem is "struct kinfo_proc" includes "struct proc" as it
is. I think this is the source of the problem. While this is the
kernel/userland interface, the format of "struct kinfo_proc" should
be independent of kernel version, and sysctl(2) for "struct kinfo proc"
should convert "struct proc" to version independent format.
Shouldn't it ?