Subject: Re: curproc in procfs
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/04/1999 11:52:59 
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:25:09 -0800 (PST) 
 Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@nas.nasa.gov> wrote:

 > Maybe it would make sense to add curprocX, leaving curproc as-is. curproc
 > referes to the process making the open() call, while curprocX refers to
 > the curproc on cpu X.
 > 
 > Thoughts?

I don't really think this is a great idea.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>