Subject: Re: Adding nanotime() API to kernel
To: Chris G. Demetriou <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 02/10/1999 08:46:46
On 09 Feb 1999 22:13:43 -0800
firstname.lastname@example.org (Chris G. Demetriou) wrote:
> One need that i've noticed implementing some things is that sometimes
> you want 'microtime()' or another 'time'-based time value and other
> times you want a microtime()-equivalent based on mono_time. Some
> timing users Really Don't Want time to go backwards, but have a need
> for accurate time...
YES! For example, subr_disk.c:disk_busy().
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>