On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Brian C. Grayson wrote:

>   Here's a different idea.  It's a gross hack, and relies upon
> gcc.

Given that our last gross hack broke twice, prompting this whole
discussion, I'm not very keen on putting another one in. :-)

I'd go for a char * alias, but aliasing version to be a function
is not a good idea, I think.

>   Is the only reason to maintain a single array simply to save
> those 120 bytes or so?

Right.

cjs
--
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   604 801 5335   De gustibus, aut bene aut nihil.
The most widely ported operating system in the world: http://www.netbsd.org