"Perry E. Metzger" wrote:
> 
> "Neil A. Carson" <neil@causality.com> writes:
> > Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > > I strongly suspect the "slow X11" is no valid description of the problem.
> > > "Sucks up 90% sys cpu time without any disk i/o and any unusual emulation
> > > traps" is, however.
> >
> > I'm using a P2-400 with Millenium 2 PCI, DMA IDE disc etc. I can
> > recreate the 'sucking performance' issue by running a compile (this
> > works both under X and not under X, but is easier to tell under X by
> > looking at the mouse pointer) and a fairly system-time heavy process
> > line ./configure.
> 
> That sounds like the bug.
> 
> Have you tried Ragge's test program?

No, I've not seen it posted. Might have been daydreaming.
	N.

-- 
Neil A. Carson