Subject: Re: Compile speed wars [was Re: FreeBSD Bus DMA]
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/12/1998 13:00:29
On Jun 12, Jonathan Stone wrote
> Even so, I grant it may well not make much of a difference to the outcome.
> But without dates and versions, this is not adequate disclosure.
> BTW, when you said that, anecdotally, the results with Linux were
> similar, it was impossible to tell whether you meant FreeBSD was
> 2.5-3x faster, than Linux, or that Linux was also 2.5x-3x faster than
> NetBSD at a specific compilation task.
> Since Linux doesnt thave netbsd emulation, maybe you mean the former,
> using Linux binaries on both FreeBSD and Linux, is that it?
Just a data point: my system at work (PPro 200, 64Mb RAM, IBM DORS 32160W
on an 2940UW) has a NetBSD 1.3/Linux 2.0.30 multiboot.
Compiling a linux kernel, using linux binaries
(chroot /emul/linux under NetBSD) took exactly the same time (8 mn 02 s)
under NetBSD or linux.
One could argue that the 2 systems were not set up the same way: under
NetBSD the FS were not mounted async :)
Now, for these kind of benchmarck to be valid, we should repeat it on
different hardware, to differentiate 'general system speed' from
'this scsi driver speed'.
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr