"John S. Dyson" writes:
> > > I think that is a great attribute, but when the user deals with
> > > problems and issues that they shouldn't because of a very narrow
> > > focused belief about "quality", then that doesn't show quality,
> > > in my opinion.
> > 
> > Which problems would these be? Not innuendo -- specifics.
> > 
> Performance, internal kernel API that doesn't work well.  You are
> welcome to consider better quality control, it really isn't my
> job.

Which APIs would these be? Can you name them? Not innuendo -- specifics.
Which performance issues would these be? Can you give us reproduceable
benchmarks needed to evaluate this assertion?

Perry