Perry E. Metzger said:
> 
> "John S. Dyson" writes:
> > Ted Lemon said:
> > > The only way I can see that they can make this claim is if their
> > > buffer cache code performs a lot better than ours, or if they've got
> > > some hack going in their stdio code that makes things work better.
> > > These are both easy suppositions to test.
> 
> > Our buffer cache does work much better, as I stated in a very recent
> > email.
> 
> If this is actually true, and this actually speeds up compiles of
> reasonable size, and you actually have benchmark data to prove this,
> then surely it would be trivial for you to shut me up by posting it.
> 
You can easily reproduce it.  If you cannot even try, why
do you try to refute?  You have lied about me, in public,
and I need an apology.

-- 
John                  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
dyson@freebsd.org     | it just makes you look stupid,
jdyson@nc.com         | and it irritates the pig.