Ted Lemon said:
> 
> The only way I can see that they can make this claim is if their
> buffer cache code performs a lot better than ours, or if they've got
> some hack going in their stdio code that makes things work better.
> These are both easy suppositions to test.
> 
Our buffer cache does work much better, as I stated in a very recent
email.  I love false assertions about "that can't be true".  It
shows how narrow and focused people can be :-).

-- 
John                  | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
dyson@freebsd.org     | it just makes you look stupid,
jdyson@nc.com         | and it irritates the pig.