> If you are going to claim that you have a better architectural design
> than us for multi-platform portability, you'd better be able to back
> that up with at least one non-Wintel box that your design is running
> on.

Actually, I'd go further than that.

There are lots of non-"Wintel" boxes which look an _awful_ lot like
x86 PCs.  Those are pretty easy.

Port to some of them, then some that look little or nothing like x86
PCs, _then_ there's a basis for a clain.



cgd