Subject: Re: new TIODCDTIMESTAMP patch
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/20/1998 16:52:12
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 16:56:41 -0700 (PDT) 
 Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:

 > Yes, so it does.  But that's the API that xntpd expects. 

It's still a bug.

At the very least, you can initialize the timestamp to zero so that
there's less of a chance that it will be random garbage.

The API still sucks, and I don't generally excuse bad APIs because the're
"defacto".  (C.f. the sockcred stuff I implemented; BSDI has a similar
interface, but it was ... lacking in many ways... needless to say,
I implemented ours differently.)

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                            Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-5                                       Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                             Pager: +1 415 428 6939