> >Showing some numbers for FreeBSD and saying that he's never gotten
> >close to them with any NetBSD system isn't particularly great
> >argument, but neither is showing no numbers whatsoever and asserting
> >that NetBSD's performance must be as good.
> 
> Hang on a minute, there.  I didnt say that.

Didn't say the former, or didn't say the latter?

The earlier text in your message seems to say something of the former
(though not quite _exactly_ what i said).  You show numbers reported
by someone else, and indicate that in your tests, even doing _less_
(i.e. no driver processing) on a faster system, you can't get those
numbers under NetBSD.  (The different is "with _any_" -- that was an
exaggeration; sorry.)

The latter is what Jason was implying, though he's later indicated
that he didn't mean to.  8-)



cgd