> Weird.   Why would you want to map the shared library at different
> locations in different instances of the same executable?   I don't see
> what benefit that has.   I can see where it makes sense for
> _different_ executables, of course.

Note that the same mechanism is used to load extensions at runtime (see
dlopen(3)), so different instances may load different shared objects, or
the same objects in different sequences.

Ciao,
Wolfgang
-- 
ws@TooLs.DE     (Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH) 	+49-228-985800