Subject: 32 bit dev_t: (or should we?)
To: Charles M. Hannum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Todd Vierling <tv@NetBSD.ORG>
Date: 01/13/1998 21:02:58
: `Yeah, right.' Past experience shows that any time you expect users
: to do two things at once, some of them are going to forget, not read
: the directions at all, or just plain screw it up. Why have the
: support hassle when you don't need it?
Okay, I read your clarification on the specinfo field stuff. What I didn't
see was a couple layers of macro overlaying in the case of the specinfo
field--that the dev_t used by checkalias() et al. _is_ 'v_rdev' thanks to a
macro, and it's used in specfs to call the device functions.
I'm a lot happier now, and I bow before you. :)
I'll be writing some code tonight!, and this time I _will_ be including some
16-bit support. We'll see what happens....
===== Todd Vierling (Personal email@example.com) =====
== "There's a myth that there is a scarcity of justice to go around, so
== that if we extend justice to 'those people,' it will somehow erode the
== quality of justice everyone else receives." -- Maria Price