Subject: Re: 32 bit dev_t, Revision 2
To: Darren Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Todd Vierling <tv@NetBSD.ORG>
Date: 01/11/1998 17:40:51
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Darren Reed wrote:
: I assume for %10 and %11 there will need to be a registry kept, no ?
Yes, there would be a registry. We already have one, for our current device
setup, but it is completely port-dependent.
My idea in thinking this was that for now, all devices could have static
numbers, but sometime in the (near?) future, devices would become dropped
into the dynamic pool even if compiled directly into the kernel (devfs
===== Todd Vierling (Personal email@example.com) =====
== "There's a myth that there is a scarcity of justice to go around, so
== that if we extend justice to 'those people,' it will somehow erode the
== quality of justice everyone else receives." -- Maria Price