Subject: Re: HPC port?
To: Paul Evans <paule@shadowfax.martex.gen.oh.us>
From: Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/16/1997 23:14:13
>On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Adam Glass wrote:
>> I think doing a pure port to an HPC platform would be fairly difficult, but
>> there are other solutions that may get you to your desired goal.
[...]
>> A second option would be to port NetBSD to Win32 so that it runs as a
>> process (or series of processes) under Win32. This solution (done properly)
>> should work on NT, Win95, and WinCE. You can then run your NetBSD
>> applications inside this environment.
>This occured to me as well. It would probably be the wisest. I'm
>wondering if the Linux people haven't done this. Also Mach 3.x with BSD
>on top would be quite "easy" to do this with. (If I'm correctly remembering
>how it works)
[...]
Someone already makes a Unix subsystem for NT. It doesn't run _under_
Win32 -- it runs as a _peer_ to the Win32 subsystem, above the basic
NT "micro-kernel". Check out http://www.softway.com/.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net
Contract software development for Windows NT, Windows 95 and Unix.
Windows NT and Unix server development in C++ and C.
--< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >--
NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32...
NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------