Subject: Re: proposed: changes to "etc" (?)
To: Paul B Dokas <dokas@cs.umn.edu>
From: Andrew Brown <codewarrior@daemon.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/12/1997 18:50:23
> From: Paul B Dokas
>
>Now this one is interesting to me. One thing that I'd love to see is
>a well implemented user space filesystem (perhaps just a daemon that
>talks to the kernel's VFS layer). For example, imagine an RCS filesystem
>built with a user space filesystem and the RCS commands. When a file is
>opened, the daemon does an 'co -l' on the file. When the file is closed,
>the daemon does a 'ci -u'. It could probably even be extended to append
>version numbers to files ala VMS (IMO this is ugly as hell, but it is
>potentially useful in some cases).
perhaps the current "backup" system (that runs nightly out of the
daily job (?! cf: uptime and update, orthogonal programs to be sure))
could be "hacked" to keep, instead of just "current" and "last", all
the files in RCS? no...you wouldn't have a log of who did what, nor
when (approximately), nor why, but you would have daily changes back
to the "beginning of time" saved for you...
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
andrew@echonyc.com (TheMan) * "ah! i see you have the internet
codewarrior@daemon.org that goes *ping*!"
warfare@graffiti.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."