Subject: Re: proposed: changes to "etc" (?)
To: None <giles@nemeton.com.au>
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@ns.feral.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/12/1997 09:10:30
 >
>On Thu, 11 Dec 1997 16:28:53 -0800  Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>> Actually, no, my 'approval' (if that) for the registry is that, somewhat
>> like ODM in aix both applications and the kernel have access to the
>> same persistent storage of arbitrary properties. This has several
>> desirable properties if you think about it.
>
>Desirable when it works; disgusting when it breaks.  In a past life I
>suffered through ODM corruptions under AIX.
>

Oh, I agree with the lossage issue. Try, as root,

	odmdelete -o CuDv

whups! you've now removed all definitions of attached devices.

But, then again, rm -f /usr/lib/libc* kills you pretty dead too.