Subject: Re: Extended Inode Information
To: Darren Reed <darrenr@cyber.com.au>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/03/1997 06:50:06
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997 17:09:44 +1100 (EST)
Darren Reed <darrenr@cyber.com.au> wrote:
> One person mentioned that it should be done so that only one 32bit longword
> is used and that is to store the actual inode address of the `next inode'
> and its type would be stored in-block. The advantage was if you changed
Heh... see the suggestion I just posted on this subject :-)
The main difference is that I want to keep the additional info in a
mostly-opaque "aux" structure.
Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: +1 415 428 6939