Subject: Re: Sharing MII and I2C code in ethernet drivers
To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@chassiron.ensta.fr>
From: Curt Sampson <cjs@portal.ca>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/21/1997 01:15:18
On Sat, 20 Sep 1997, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sep 19, John Nemeth wrote
> > No. One physical device -> one line in the config file. Having
> > to put three lines in the config file for one physical board with a
> > single function is gross and absolutely rediculous.
> ...
> You CAN attach multiple devices to a MII bus (up to 32). And the ethernet board
> I'm working on has 2 PHYs: one for the 10b2 port, and one for the 10/100 rj45
> port. Not to mention boards that can do ethernet/100vg anylan.
The real question is, is there any reason at all that someone would
want to include a device driver for a card that did not support
certain PHYs not available on the card. If not, why bother to make
it configurable? It just adds unnecessary complexity to the config
file.
I really don't see any need to split this out.
cjs
Curt Sampson cjs@portal.ca Info at http://www.portal.ca/
Internet Portal Services, Inc. `And malt does more than Milton can
Vancouver, BC (604) 257-9400 To justify God's ways to man.'