Subject: Re: ncr53c9x changes proposed
To: Gordon W. Ross <gwr@mc.com>
From: Paul Kranenburg <pk@cs.few.eur.nl>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/01/1997 23:42:22
> May I safely assume that the lack of response means there are
> no objections to the proposed changes?
> 

They seem ok.

Actually I thought I had done the timeout/untimeout reshuffling quite
some time ago.. hmm maybe these got lost in transit to /sys/dev.


Why do you need the `pad[3]' ?

-pk