Subject: Re: New spl level: splsched()
To: Jonathan Stone <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/05/1997 13:12:13
On Sun, 02 Mar 1997 19:09:20 -0800
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> However, rom a software engineering perspective, I really, really
> *dont* want to see these changes commited until the interrupt
> architecture is documented well enough for, say, a new portmaster to
> understand it and be sure that a given port actually *meets* the
> design assumptions.
See my previous message on this list... If you're not sure, the
"safe" implementation is:
#define splsched() splhigh()
...since that's the call it's replacing. Certainly, that wouldn't
make things any _worse_.
> Is it necessary to commit the changes this week?
Well, it sure would be nice to get the new com driver in the tree,
and this Really Helps.
Jason R. Thorpe email@example.com
NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939