On Sun, 02 Mar 1997 19:09:20 -0800 
 Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:

 > However, rom a software engineering perspective, I really, really
 > *dont* want to see these changes commited until the interrupt
 > architecture is documented well enough for, say, a new portmaster to
 > understand it and be sure that a given port actually *meets* the
 > design assumptions.

See my previous message on this list... If you're not sure, the
"safe" implementation is:

#define	splsched()	splhigh()

...since that's the call it's replacing.  Certainly, that wouldn't
make things any _worse_.

 > Is it necessary to commit the changes this week?

Well, it sure would be nice to get the new com driver in the tree,
and this Really Helps.

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939