Subject: Re: New spl level: splsched()
To: Jonathan Stone <>
From: Jason Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/05/1997 13:12:13
On Sun, 02 Mar 1997 19:09:20 -0800 
 Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:

 > However, rom a software engineering perspective, I really, really
 > *dont* want to see these changes commited until the interrupt
 > architecture is documented well enough for, say, a new portmaster to
 > understand it and be sure that a given port actually *meets* the
 > design assumptions.

See my previous message on this list... If you're not sure, the
"safe" implementation is:

#define	splsched()	splhigh()

...since that's the call it's replacing.  Certainly, that wouldn't
make things any _worse_.

 > Is it necessary to commit the changes this week?

Well, it sure would be nice to get the new com driver in the tree,
and this Really Helps.

Jason R. Thorpe                             
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939