Subject: Re: Clock synchronization with ISDN
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christian Kuhtz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/17/1997 12:00:56
On Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:25:58 -0500, "Perry E. Metzger" <email@example.com> wrote:
> Martin Husemann writes:
> > The (classical) question is: should I hand out the timestamps as a seperate
> > device, run the standard nntp deamon to use them, which in turn calls the
> > appropriate kernel functions to adjust the time?
> > Or should I shortcut this and adjust the time right inside the
> > kernel, without any device and userland daemon?
> I wouldn't bother. Line latency distribution is probably high enough
> to negate any advantage you would gain. What *will* help is the kernel
> PLL stuff, since it will keep the clock better disciplined between
The timestamp is coming over the 16Kbit/s D channel, which is designed to be
a very low latency out-of-band signaling channel.
Why would latency be high on the D channel? Assuming you're not abusing it
for something like a low volume X.25 channel, by definition, there should
never be any significant latency.
Christian Kuhtz <firstname.lastname@example.org> (work), <email@example.com> (personal)
UNIX/Network Specialist, "A German in the U.S., speaking for himself *gasp*"
Paranet, Inc. Rocky Mountain Branch, http://www.paranet.com/ MIME/NeXTmail Ok