Subject: Re: Proposal for generalized MI soft interrupts
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Gordon W. Ross <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/30/1997 11:10:01
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 09:05:05 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Charles M. Hannum" <email@example.com>
> Subject: Proposal for generalized MI soft interrupts
This looks pretty good to me, though I'd suggest one name change:
> void softintr_register(cookie)
The name "softintr_request" seems much more obvious to me.
The name "softintr_register" could easily be presumed to do the
same job as what "softintr_establish" does...