Subject: Re: "esp" driver reorg proposal
To: Gordon W. Ross <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@CS.cmu.edu>
Date: 01/28/1997 11:00:30
> So, perhaps a better question is, "would we rather have a less
> beautiful shared ncr53c90 driver using <machine/xxxvar.h>, or
> would we rather continue using separate copies until someone
> finds time to write binary glue?" Probably the latter. :-/
Given the fact that we'll have to live with the result for years (else
pay the pain of doing correctly later what could have been done
correctly initially), i'd say definitely the latter.
It's not like the current method actually takes much time in
maintenance. once you get sync'd up, life becomes relatively easy.