Subject: Re: Documentation on BPFs?
To: <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/13/1997 16:46:34 
   Date: Mon, 13 Jan 97 15:53:51 +0100
   From: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (Martin Cracauer)

   Not that I argue it is better than BPF, just dit should be considered
   for portable programs. Newer tcpdump (3.x) use it insstead of bpf.

libpcap (dunno which exact version) is included in NetBSD since -1.1
(I think), btw. Man pages should be there.

	-is