Subject: Re: poll(2)
To: John Birrell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Terry Lambert <email@example.com>
Date: 12/10/1996 11:22:25
> > "Discuss." :-)
> If NetBSD's kernel is moving towards everything being done in timespecs,
> then the best that the real kernel *should* offer would be a nanopoll
> syscall with a timespec argument. Then libc could provide wrappers for
> poll(2) and upoll(2).
poll(3) and upoll(2).
also select(3) and nselect(3).
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.