Subject: Re: poll(2)
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/10/1996 12:36:43
Jonathan Stone wrote:
> Re naming, npoll() is more consistent with the sleep()/usleep() usage.
> Does POSIX have anything to say here?

nanopoll() is more consistent with the sleep()/nanosleep() usage which
are defined in POSIX 1003.1b. usleep() is not POSIX AFAIK.

-- 
John Birrell                                CIMlogic Pty Ltd
jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org           119 Cecil Street
Ph  +61  3 9690 6900                        South Melbourne Vic 3205
Fax +61  3 9690 6650                        Australia
Mob +61 18  353  137