Subject: Re: Rev 1.19 of busdma.doc
To: Justin T. Gibbs <email@example.com>
From: Bill Sommerfeld <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/11/1996 09:46:45
> If the 'op' is a compile-time constant and the "function" is either inline
> or a macro, you get the same effect without having to expand the name space
> of the API for each new 'op' you may add.
Is the name space of the API that precious a commodity?
I'm not sure that preserving it is worth the cost of having a complex
macro with an unreadable nest of ?: operators, or an overly large
inline function which *definitely* bloats up the code if someone makes
the mistake of passing a variable op to it.