Subject: Re: But why?
To: Larry McVoy <lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com>
From: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/26/1996 00:34:11
>Check out cachefs.  cachefs + nfs is pretty close to AFS in many ways, without
>some of the AFS problems.  I'll admit that AFS has some cool stuff.  I'd love
>to see that cool stuff get added to NFS without all the DCE bloat.

having seen the internals of AFS, i have to add:

with an implementation that doesn't SUCK.


cgd