Subject: Re: ip->ip_len signed?
To: Kevin M. Lahey <kml@nas.nasa.gov>
From: Rob Healey <rob-healey@norstar.com>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/25/1996 10:35:44
> In message <199610250158.PAA27381@haleakala.aloha.net>Tim Newsham writes
> >
> > I noticed this in an include file and it struck me
> >as odd:
> >
> > struct ip {
> > ...
> > int16_t ip_len;
> > ...
> > }
> >
> >why is the length field signed?
>
> Because nobody would ever want to send an IP packet bigger than
> 32K, right? I posted some patches for this earlier in the year,
> and I promise I'll do a send-pr on it within the next week, :-)
> as soon as I get the actual 1.2 release running.
>
> I'll also try to spend a little time to ensure that the Win95
> ping bug (bogusly large pings crashing various systems) doesn't
> bite us...
>
Remember: The ping bug isn't related to ICMP per say but to
IP, ANY IP, re/de fragmentation code... B^(. Oddly enough our
favorite object of scorn, Slowlaris, doesn't seem to be
effected by this particular bug even though Slowlaris is usually
a roach motel from hell...
-Rob