Subject: Re: p_nice
To: Wolfgang Solfrank <>
From: Charles M. Hannum <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/30/1996 15:00:08 (Wolfgang Solfrank) writes:

> While the explicit declaration of p_nice as signed char would solve the
> problem, I'd much rather see either

I really don't see a plausible reason to object to it.

> 	p_nice declared as short


> 	p_nice left as a char, and have the NZERO code be fixed to allow
> 		and use a value other than 0 for NZERO (just like PZERO).

This would be fine, too.