Subject: Re: Proposed change to a whole load of drivers...
To: Brett Lymn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 09/09/1996 09:36:51
> I want to be able to print out the memory i/o address, dma channel (if
> any) and interrupt. This means I need to get the softc structure for
> each of the drivers. The problem is that, currently, they are
> embedded into the driver code itself which means I either need to
> parallel the structure in my own code (dangerous and not very nice) or
> put the softc structure into a header I can include. If there are no
> objections, what I would like to do is create a header file for each
> driver which contains the softc struct and have then installed into
In a word, "NO."
Quite frankly, doing it that way is _stupid_, for several reasons:
(1) why do all of the headers end up in /usr/include/machine?
Many of them have nothing to do with machine-dependent
(2) your talking abuout exporting dozens of new header files
to user-land. That, in itself, is objectionable.
(3) softc contents are intended solely for the private use
of drivers. Your approach would encourage others
(your program included) to muck around with the internals
of others' softcs, which violates a hell of a lot of
abstraction barriers and is generally "Wrong."
(4) Your approach does not and cannot scale. Add a new
driver, you need to add new code to your program. That's
(5) You already have a way to find out how a device was
configured (not necessarily how it actually looks, but
how it was configured), in the devices' cfdata.
> Any comments/screams/alternatives?
If you're trying to show exactly what's in the machine and how it's
configured, use dmesg or /var/log/messages, or whatever. It's
got as much accurate information as it can have, and it's already
If you're trying to generate a new config file, then you already have
ways to do what you want without resorting to this (in my opinion,
very ill-considered) hack; see (5) above.