Subject: Re: uipc_socket.c
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christoph Badura <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/19/1996 16:29:00
Michael Graff writes:
>email@example.com (Christoph Badura) writes:
>> Michael Graff writes:
>> >However, I don't agree that we should allow "bad" packets to be transmitted
>> >using sendto(). IMHO, if you are going to do this, use BPF directly.
>> Why? Do you have any reasons for that?
>Why should we _allow_ our IP output code to send bad packets?
Because, as Doug Gwyn said, Unix wasn't designed to prevent you from
doing stupid things...
>trapping errors is much more important than the (somewhat specific)
>use of sending bad packets to test stacks.
I think that these are different things that are largely independent.
I also think that the networking code should not panic because there's
some illegal or unexpected value in some protocol header. This is a
separate issue from being able to send illegal packets.
Christoph Badura firstname.lastname@example.org
You don't need to quote my .signature. Everyone has seen it by now.
Besides, it doesn't add anything to the current thread.