Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp> writes:

> I think it is better to use driver name like "com0" instead of
> "intr4". Of course, this requires to handle return value of interrupt
> handler to cope with shared irq.
> 
> BTW, do you use "struct evcnt" to implement it ? (see sparc port)

No, but I suspect I should be, no?  ;)

Right now I'm doing the old static name thing.  I think that will change.

> > If anyone else wants to try out the changes before I commit them, let me
> > know.
> 
> I'd like to try it.

I'll mail you the diffs.