Subject: Re: NetBSD master CVS tree commits
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Noriyuki Soda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/08/1996 20:49:13
> I am not sure what is the best solution either. I was just trying to
> get the kernel routines that appeared to be using c library functions
> to use a standard one instead of rolling their own. I agree with you
> about the locale issues, but so far the file system code is us centric.
> So what is better? Let the filesystem code use a single strncasecmp,
> or let each filesystem roll their own? In reality the majority of
> filesystems are developed in the states anyway?
In Japan (and probably in China, Taiwan, Korea, and others), there is
already a problem in msdosfs, I intend to send PR to fix it (adding
mount option to msdosfs).
email@example.com Software Research Associates, Inc., Japan
(Noriyuki Soda) software tools and technology group